Assess readiness across the full decision chain, not only whether a threat looked suspicious.
Measure before a real incident
Deepfake readiness assessment for people, process and response
Measure whether executives, high-risk employees and response teams can recognize, verify, escalate and contain AI-enabled impersonation attempts—and identify what to improve next.
Prioritize the functions attackers are most likely to pressure during high-consequence requests.
Turn the assessment into coaching, workflow changes and repeatable measurement.
Operational readiness
Policies do not prove that verification works under pressure
A policy may instruct employees to verify unusual requests, but it cannot show whether that process works when a familiar voice demands urgency, an executive appears on video, or a believable message creates pressure to act.
Deceptiment uses authorized, consent-based scenarios to assess the interaction between human judgment, business controls and incident response. The assessment reveals whether people pause, use an independent verification path, report the attempt and enable a coordinated response.
This is an organizational readiness assessment—not a technical evaluation of deepfake-detection algorithms. It focuses on the decisions and controls that remain essential even when synthetic media looks or sounds convincing.
Risk-based scope01 02 03 04 05 06
Assess the roles attackers are most likely to pressure
Every program is shaped around real business exposure rather than a generic awareness test.
Executives & assistants
Test verification and escalation when authority, confidentiality and urgency are used to influence a decision.
Finance & procurement
Exercise urgent payments, supplier-detail changes, invoice exceptions and executive impersonation.
Help desk & identity teams
Assess resistance to password resets, MFA changes, access recovery and identity-manipulation requests.
HR & people operations
Evaluate handling of sensitive employee information and requests from apparently trusted colleagues.
Security & incident response
Measure intake, triage, evidence handling, coordination and containment after a suspected attempt.
Communications & customer teams
Explore response when synthetic media could affect customers, partners or organizational reputation.
Assessment lifecycle01 02 03 04 05 06
From credible scenarios to prioritized improvement
Discover exposure
Identify critical roles, trusted channels, high-consequence decisions and existing verification procedures.
Set the baseline
Define expected behaviors, evidence requirements and measures before the exercise begins.
Design & approve
Create realistic scenarios within agreed authorization, consent, privacy and safety boundaries.
Run the exercise
Deliver controlled simulations through approved WhatsApp, email and Microsoft Teams voice workflows.
Analyze readiness
Review recognition, verification, reporting, escalation and coordination across people and teams.
Prioritize action
Translate findings into coaching, workflow changes, playbook improvements and repeat testing.
Frequently asked questions
Deepfake assessment, clearly explained
What does the assessment measure?
Recognition, independent verification, reporting, escalation and coordinated response to AI-enabled impersonation.
Is this deepfake detection?
No. It assesses organizational, human and process readiness rather than media-forensics models.
Who should participate?
Executives, finance, procurement, HR, service desk, communications, security operations and other high-risk roles.
What evidence is provided?
Readiness observations, control gaps, coaching priorities, response actions and audit-ready exercise evidence.
Establish your deepfake readiness baseline
Discuss the roles, decisions and response processes that matter most to your organization.
Book a live demonstration →